Comments for Watch Full Movie

Comment on Star Trek by tricksoftrade01

tricksoftrade01 — Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:44:32 +0000

Two words to describe this movie, 'Mindless Action'. It is really sad to see that the entire Star Trek universe has changed to appeal to the 'Ooooo Navy Seals!!' crowd. Star Trek has had a history of stories that centered around the human condition as well as science fiction, which made the series great.

The new helm at Star Trek knows what the general public wants, less talking and more action action action! In fact almost 50% of this film is centered around action scenes and the plot was summed up in a laughable 3 min mindmeld. It was almost as if the director had the thought 'No one will look at their Blackberry during THIS movie'. This movie says 'Check your brain at the popcorn counter and enjoy the roller coaster ride!'

Being a business, you want to sell your product the to the most people, but you have to be careful not to alienate the core audience. Well JJ Abrams, you lost one, because mindless action is NOT what Star Trek is all about.

Each generation seems to be able to absorb information faster than the next, but there is a dangerous flip side. That they become more and more intolerant of 'down time' or a reflecting phase in a movie after a action scene. This is where character development, key plot devices etc. and most important story telling can take place.

This Star Trek is just another sugary treat that has no gripping story but cool action scenes. Father time is often the best censor of movies, when the 'coolness' of those action scenes wears off it will be forgotton. It is a good story that holds true to the censor of time. After all who remembers the plot of 'Navy Seals'?

'The story is king'- Clint Eastwood

Comment on Star Trek by luis-blasini

luis-blasini — Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:44:32 +0000

I really enjoyed this movie and I think it's great to feel that way, especially since it's rooted from a cheesy show that I never gave a crap about in the past and that was pretty much the point of this redux, wasn't it?

I've been reading several post from the Old Star Trek fans. How this movie killed Star Trek. Really? REALLY? Aw, no fat guys in polyester uniforms and Beatle boots fighting other fat guys in rubber Halloween masks! Cry me a river.

Focus on the positives: J.J. Abrams making something that doesn't involve polar bears (well, there's the one polar bear thing, but, you know, he tried), Romulans looking more like scary people and less like members of a gay bar house band, the return of Starfleet-regulation skirts and FMBs, set design that doesn't resemble a Best Western lobby (ok, that crack was reserved for Next Gen), a mean cast age of 30. Karl Urban!

It was a fun movie. Sure, the plotting and dialogue will need an upgrade in later installments, but damn if this flick didn't have its heart in the right place.

I saw the film and enjoyed it, but it was about as deep as the late 60's TV show was. Which was nothing more than cheesy science fiction.

Comment on Star Trek by zuper_llrot

zuper_llrot — Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:44:32 +0000

Its cornier than *beep*, it gives a lame villiain and if its canon changes everything in star trek. Am i.the only person who thought it was juat so... Dumb and poorly written and casted, complete, utter garbage!

PS 4 oscars! Are you *beep* me???

Soon, that kid will be deader than steve Irwin in a tank full of stingrays!

Comment on Captain America: The First Avenger by spinnhawk

spinnhawk — Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:44:24 +0000

who else would be upset if bucky is just another soldier instead of caps sidekick/partner

Comment on Captain America: The First Avenger by keltigerfight

keltigerfight — Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:44:24 +0000

So what was done to the Superman and Batman franchises, is now being done to Spiderman. No surprises there tbh, and I admit I was disappointed with Spiderman 3.

Still, considering how Batman Begins/The Dark Knight has seemingly revived the Batman legacy, this could be a good thing for Spiderman. Though, considering Disney now owns Marvel, it’s probably going to be streamlined a bit to keep in touch with Disney and how they do things nowadays.

Comment on Captain America: The First Avenger by axlsfrontman

axlsfrontman — Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:44:24 +0000

I was wondering what the after credit scene will be??

For some reason i’m thinking a Bruce banner/hulk scene.

Comment on Green Lantern by lowdw

lowdw — Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:43:36 +0000

he was a lantern native to an area of space called the "obsidian deeps", which had no light. Rot Lop Fan was, like everyone else in the deeps, blind, and had no understanding of the concepts of light, or color. Katmas Tui goes there to try and recruit him to the corps, but finds serious trouble in explaining to him who they are, and what exactly it is they do. So she eventually fashions the ring she was going to give him into a bell, and imbues it with the power to manipulate solid sound waves. as far as Rot Lop Fan is aware, by the end of the story he has been inducted into the "F-Sharp Bell Corps." It was a bizarre, but very well crafted little story, thats one of my favorites:)

you guys got any obscure favorites?

Comment on Green Lantern by sweetre15

sweetre15 — Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:43:36 +0000

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/Poniverse/news/?a=21510

Thoughts?

Your friendly neighborhood: http://i28.tinypic.com/2gueia0.jpg

Comment on Green Lantern by sidiousdarth

sidiousdarth — Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:43:36 +0000

Comment on Zombieland by StayStrong_xo

StayStrong_xo — Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:12:50 +0000

Okay, I loved this movie, but something bugged me.

When Columbus and Wichita were talking about the year 1997, she mentioned being in the 8th grade,which would make them about 13 or 14 during 1997. But earlier on in the movie Columbus said he was just starting college, which would make him 18 or 20 tops at the present time.

Unless Wichita is older than Columbus, and is like 25, which would make her 13 in 97.